For agencies & service companies
The internal tool your team built stopped being safe to change.
It stops breaking — and your team keeps building on it without you, and without fear.
Another patch fixed one thing and broke another. I am Artem Kiselev. I stabilize vibe-coded internal tools so the next change does not undo the last one.
Artem Kiselev
Does not oblige you to continue. This is not a 45-minute pitch.
For owners of agencies and service companies (~25–60 people) whose ops run on a tool they vibe-coded.
Recognize this?
- “every time we add something, something else breaks”
- “it used to open instantly, now it takes eight seconds”
- “the AI confidently fixes one thing and breaks another”
- “the person who built it won't touch it anymore”
- “the numbers in the report don't match the invoice we sent”
- “we're afraid to touch it before a client deadline”
- “I don't know how exposed our client data is”
Tools:Lovable, Replit, Bolt, Base44, Glide, Softr, Airtable, n8n, Zapier, Supabase, Cursor, Retool
Idle team hours, a missed client deadline, and operational data you cannot roll back — the bill for a tool cheaper to ship than to keep.
22% of organizations surveyed had at least one production incident from an AI-generated internal tool in the past 12 months. Retool, State of AI Governance 2026
Why the next fix does not stick
The tool was built the right way for what you needed then: fast, useful, live in days. It breaks now because the system has no memory of itself. Every coding agent starts from zero — like Memento, waking with no yesterday. Locally sensible changes pile up until the next one costs more and risks more. Stability comes from practices and agent notes in the repo, not from a better prompt.
What you get, and what it costs
- Health-check — $1,9005 business days. Written report with priorities, fix/rebuild/buy per node, and next-step cost. Credited toward later work. You keep the report either way.
- Rescue — $5,000–15,000Fixed price after diagnosis. Default: stabilize. Rebuild a node when the numbers say that is cheaper. Hard cap — if it will not fit, I say so.
- Retainer — $1,000–2,500/moInsurance and judgment, not presence. Watching, incidents, current agent notes, build-vs-buy. The system keeps working if the engagement ends — knowledge lives in your repo.
You keep: Agent instructions in your repository; System map and runbooks; Tests on the critical paths. Your repository, accounts, keys.
Diagnosis ends one of three ways: stabilize what exists, rebuild a part, or buy ready-made. Choice by cost and time. A full rewrite is not the default.
See a redacted sample report · Composition, guarantees, and terms →
Has this worked for someone like you
Who I am
I founded, grew, and sold a technology company — I was the business that pays for the tool and owns the fallout.
I build and run systems with coding agents every day: product, fullstack, infra, and data.
Same person from diagnosis through operations. Nothing is handed off.
Start with a diagnostic
This page is not for you if you need packaging for a funding round — that is a different conversation, or if you want a $50 one-off fix with no judgment on what should stay or go. Full list on /rescue.
After you write: I reply personally, usually the same day. You and I confirm scope on a short call that is not a pitch. You get a written report in 5 business days. Nothing obliges you to continue.
$1,900 · 5 business days
Why is the diagnostic paid?
Five days of reading your system is real work. A free audit is a sales call. Paying means you own the report even if you stop.
Can my team keep building after you leave?
That is the point. Instructions, tests, and runbooks stay in your repo so the next agent change does not break the last one.
Do you know my tool?
If it is on the list above, yes. If not, say what it is. Failure patterns are mostly the same.